Website Readability & Clarity Checker
Paste a URL and get six real readability formulas — Flesch, Flesch-Kincaid, Gunning Fog, SMOG, Coleman-Liau, and ARI — computed from the page's actual text, plus the exact sentences dragging your score down.
Works best on content-heavy pages — a blog post, docs page, or marketing page with real paragraphs.
The 6 Formulas, Explained
Every score below comes from real, published readability research — not a proprietary black box. Each formula weighs sentence length and word complexity slightly differently, which is why we show all six instead of picking a favorite.
Flesch Reading Ease
The most widely cited readability score, 0-100 (higher = easier). Combines average sentence length and average syllables per word. 60-70 is considered plain, everyday English.
Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level
The same underlying math as Reading Ease, rescaled to a U.S. school grade level. A score of 8 means the text is readable by an average 8th grader.
Gunning Fog Index
Weighs 'complex words' (3+ syllables) more heavily than the Flesch formulas. It's the strictest of the six on jargon-heavy writing.
SMOG Index
Designed for health and safety writing where comprehension really matters. Estimates the years of education needed to fully understand the text, based purely on complex-word density.
Coleman-Liau Index
Uses characters per word instead of syllables, which makes it easy to compute reliably (syllable counting is always a heuristic) and less sensitive to unusual word choices.
Automated Readability Index (ARI)
Similar to Coleman-Liau — character-based rather than syllable-based — originally designed for real-time readability scoring on typewriters and early computers.
The Flesch Reading Ease Scale
Known Limitations
- Syllable counting uses a vowel-group heuristic, not a dictionary — it's accurate for the vast majority of English words but can be off by one syllable on unusual spellings. This averages out over a full page of text.
- Sentence splitting relies on punctuation and capitalization cues. It correctly handles common abbreviations (Dr., Mr., etc., vs., e.g.) and decimal numbers, but unusual formatting can occasionally cause a mis-split.
- Like the Dashboard UX Analyzer, this tool only sees the raw server-rendered HTML — client-rendered pages that inject their text via JavaScript will show as low word count.
Frequently Asked Questions
What reading level should my SaaS website target?
Most high-converting B2B SaaS marketing copy targets a 6th-8.5th grade level — plain, direct language. This holds even for technical, expert audiences: simpler writing reads faster and converts better, it doesn't signal a lack of sophistication.
Why do the six scores disagree with each other?
Each formula was developed independently, for different purposes (Flesch for general text, SMOG for health literacy, ARI for real-time computation) and weighs sentence length vs. word complexity differently. Use the average, and treat any single score as one data point.
My score seems low but my writing feels simple — why?
Check the 'Sentences Dragging Your Score Down' list. A handful of very long sentences (25+ words) can pull down an otherwise simple page's score more than you'd expect, since all six formulas weight sentence length heavily.
Does this analyze the whole site or just one page?
One URL at a time. Run it against your highest-traffic pages individually — homepage, top blog posts, pricing page — since readability can vary a lot page to page.
Suggested Tools for Your Stack
Explore related utilities in this workflow or discover cross-category tools.
Related in Website & Conversion
Landing Page UX & Conversion Analyzer
Score headline clarity, CTA prominence, trust signals, and conversion probability in 1 scan.
SaaS Marketing Website UX Audit
Audit B2B feature grids, self-serve vs demo funnels, and enterprise compliance badges.
Recommended from Other Categories
SaaS UX & Friction Audit
0–100 Product Experience Score across onboarding, IA, visual hierarchy, and navigation.
SaaS Pricing Page & Psychology Analyzer
Audit tier differentiation, annual toggle psychology, feature comparison, and objection handling.